Where Does Bad Corporate Culture Come From, and Can It Be Corrected?

Bad corporate culture arises naturally from human nature, lack of management savvy, and bad or clueless management behavior. Corporate culture is built from the combined experiences of the members of the organization, the quality of their interactions with each other and outsiders, the results of the organization’s efforts, and the psychological tone set by top management and every level of management beneath it. All of these factors are expressed in, and some are caused by, management behavior, and poor management behavior will always affect the culture negatively. The good news is that you can work to correct and improve the culture at your own level.

Understanding the fundamentals of human nature and the psychological origins of poor management behavior is key to being a truly “savvy” manager. One key factor working against being a good manager is the natural difficulty of keeping one’s perspective in a sustained group. While the classical groupthink phenomenon is one possible outcome, another is loss of personal perspective, often acquired through bad experiences. This problem comes from bad experiences with others, especially those we perceive to have power over us (managers).

Pain can make a person lose their perspective. Once one has been abused or injured, psychologically or otherwise, by another person, the remembered pain makes the incident loom large in one’s memory, and restoring proper perspective takes understanding and introspection. The perspective that is lost that most negatively affects managers is the knowledge that, at the most basic levels of motivation, everyone wants to feel good about themselves and wants to feel they are making a positive difference in their job. Keeping this fact foremost in our thinking is key to being an effective manager and getting the most from one’s subordinates. It also helps one delegate more effectively and manage one’s time more efficiently.

Psychological pain can come from common sources. All it takes, for example, is one boss treating you like you don’t know anything, making you do meaningless work, responding to their own insecurities by giving you punitive assignments because they feel threatened by something you said, or actually taking out their own past bad experiences and psychological issues on you, and the pain (frustration, feeling of being devalued, etc.) you experience will amplify the memory of the experience in your mind. It is human nature to recall much more vividly our painful past experiences, as it is a natural survival trait that helps us avoid recurrences, but it can also cause us to lose the perspective that the good experiences outweigh the bad by a huge proportion.

Painful experiences make people wary long after the original incidents. Once abused, most people will tend to be overly watchful for similar circumstances, even after the original incident is forgotten. They can become conditioned to expect similar treatment from other bosses even though they only experienced the abuse from one of many, and, worse yet, they may wind up emulating the bad behavior (forcing, for example) because it is their most memorable reference to how bosses act. In essence, they lose perspective and begin overgeneralizing (another aspect of human nature) and thinking that most or all bosses act badly, or that this is the way to manage others. It can happen to almost anyone, but the knowledge that it doesn’t have to is the starting point for being a better manager.

Common bad management behaviors reveal the prevalence of loss of perspective and an all-too-common poor understanding of human nature. The forceful, “Do it because I said so” management style is a good example. While management research has repeatedly shown that “forcing” and “command-and-control” style management are only appropriate in relatively rare circumstances, many people retain the mistaken opinion that it makes up a large part of the management function. Even the U.S. Army has found that command-style management is only of value in certain circumstances, as when one is leading a squad of inexperienced 18-year-olds into enemy fire, and is much less effective in other circumstances. The savvy commander knows a squad is far more effective with every member contributing their knowledge, perception, and creativity, among other assets, to accomplishing the mission. They also know that they need to engage their subordinates in a positive way to get the benefit of those assets. They often achieve this by maintaining a culture of teamwork, collaboration, and mutual respect in their organization.

A savvy manager understands that conditioning, a form of unconscious learning, can happen to anyone including them, and can be countered. It is easy to become conditioned to expect abuse or just poor quality management behavior from one’s superiors, and, in the absence of better knowledge and understanding, it is easy to model such behaviors in one’s management of others. I believe this accounts for the seemingly large number of bad experiences most of us acquire working in large bureaucracies. We can, however, counter our conditioning once we understand what is happening to us, and consciously replace it with real knowledge.

Changing or countering one’s conditioning is possible. Some of the best managers have undoubtedly taken the time and exercised the introspection to think through their beliefs about management, trace them back to past experiences and learning, and establish better ways of thinking, in effect reconditioning themselves to be better managers. A person may do this once in their life, or many times, but it is always an extremely productive (though not necessarily easy) undertaking.

Culture originates in the behavior of individuals. Organizational culture is built on the behaviors of the members of the culture, and poor management behavior at any level naturally affects the levels subordinate to it – “crap rolls down hill”, as they say. An abusive or clueless top or middle manager can create a culture of negativism and poor performance that extends beneath them all the way to the bottom of the organizational pyramid, and even to supplier organizations. Anyone who has worked in more than a couple of bureaucracies has most likely experienced or witnessed this syndrome.

Culture can be changed for the better. A savvy, positive thinking manager can create a constructive culture of productivity, creativity, and even fun among their subordinates, and achieve superior results, even amidst an otherwise negative culture. It is far easier, however, if the overall culture is at least tolerant, if not actually supportive, or if the manager setting the cultural tone and making the change is isolated from the rest of the organization in significant ways.

Changing culture in a positive direction is rarely easy. As W. Edwards Deming said, however, “quality can be no better than the intent at the top.” A good manager can move the culture of the organization beneath her or him in positive and more productive directions, but if a negative cultural tone is persistently coming from above, he or she will have to fight constantly to maintain that more positive cultural beneath them, and may be criticized and even undermined by their less savvy peers, who may feel threatened by their improved results. For this reason, an organizational culture will rarely be better overall than is determined by the behavior of the topmost management. Middle managers who buck a strongly negative culture often eventually burn out and leave the organization, are unrecognized and fail to be promoted, or give up their management role. While they “stick to their guns”, however, their results will tend to be superior, their employees happier and more productive, and their jobs more satisfying.

Bad corporate culture happens, but it can be corrected. In summary, while it is natural for bad organizational culture to develop, this tendency can be countered and a more positive and productive organizational culture can be produced, though it requires savvy and introspective management. It is within the power of each of us to do the introspective work and be more savvy, as managers or rank and file employees, and I highly recommend it. I also recommend, as you do this important work, to record your thoughts and experiences in a journal for later review. In doing so you will improve yourself, and give yourself increased capacity to influence your organizational culture in in more positive directions.

Personal note – My wife wanted me to include more of the personal anecdotes that have led me to these conclusions (which are by no means comprehensive), but I don’t want to write an entire book here. (perhaps at a later time – I’ve many times considered pursuing a Ph.D. in Organizational Behavior …)

As always, I welcome your comments and questions, as I always learn from them.

6 Responses to “Where Does Bad Corporate Culture Come From, and Can It Be Corrected?”

  1. dan barnett Says:

    I liked your blog and I think a few of your personal anecdotes would be interesting. I found myself searching corporate culture today in an effort of understand a little better if the trend of many companies might be devaluing their own employees. Unfortunately, I believe I have joined a company who does not value their own salespeople and a prevailing corporate culture seems to emerge the longer I am there. I would think the cost of training new salespeople constantly would be a huge waste of company resources, yet there is constant turnover as though there is this endless supply of salesmen that they continue to hire in the hopes they find company drones to carry on. Aren’t salesmen the primary source of revenue for a product driven company? I am so personally disappointed that I have misjudged and have been misled by this company and will have to start my career search all over again. Unfortunately, this prevailing company culture starts at the top and I’m starting to recognize it’s festering infection into other areas including production and quality control. I do not have the energy to try to change this attitude with a national company and I’d rather expend my energy seeking other employment. What a shame.

  2. timprosser Says:

    Thanks for your comment, Dan.
    You are probably making a correct assessment of your situation, and there is undoubtedly a better assignment for you out there. You didn’t say exactly how big (tall) the company you’ve joined is, but it gets harder to change the culture the farther one is from the top – the ultimate source of culture in almost all companies. I agree that the attitude that any function in a company is more disposable than another is a bad one, and creates an imbalance that inevitably undermines the firm’s success. Salespeople are a key conduit for some of the most important information a company uses: knowledge of what the customers do with the product, what they want and don’t want, and what they do or did as a substitute before they used your product, for example. I am sure you can find a company with a more positive culture, and which appreciates and gains the full benefit of sales people such as yourself. Such companies are out there, and I would bet they are among the most successful in their industries.
    Best of luck, and thanks again for the comment. – Tim

  3. thenonconformer Says:

    As to the bad corporate management.. Firstly there are positive and negative management styles that reflect one’s own management or actual personal morality ..

    As to the overall really bad corporate management.. tend to be as a mostly general false tendency even these days to hire your friends into managerial positions.. bad friends who cannot be rebuked, chastised generally,, incompetent, ineffective friends with bad values like the person who hired them.. and alcoholics like to be with alcoholics too..

    We have had 2 years of a great examples of this with the election of Stephen Harper and the new Conservative party of Canada who broke his promises and had initially said he would not hire his friends like the other parties, but next he hired hundreds of them into government jobs, mostly unqualified persons still too like Preston Manning of Consumer Affairs..

  4. timprosser Says:

    Thanks for your comment, “thenonconformer”.
    The thrust of my entry above is that management skill is very personal, and that bad culture is a result of poorly understood and managed human nature. I want to encourage managers and would-be managers to do the introspective work and study that builds a foundation for good management skills.
    I agree that nepotism in any form, hiring friends and/or relatives, is a poor and clueless way to build an organization, and bound to produce lackluster results. Your point that nepotism brings in extra and inappropriate considerations based on the extra-business relationships is an excellent one, and occurs all too frequently. Such a situation certainly results in a degraded environment for decision making
    Thanks again – Tim

  5. HRM Today - Blog Archive » Extreme Makeover: Corporate Culture Edition Says:

    [...] to be willing to put time and energy into it; unfortunately, as Timothy F. Prosser observes in this recent On Effective Management post, “It is easy to become conditioned to expect abuse or just poor quality management behavior from [...]

  6. frormagraitty Says:

    Nice internet site. hope to visit again:D

Leave a Reply